Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(repo): use @pnpm/exe over pnpm for CI runs #16495

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2023

Conversation

meeroslav
Copy link
Contributor

@meeroslav meeroslav commented Apr 24, 2023

Use @pnpm/exe instead of pnpm on CIs

Based on the investigation using @pnpm/exe (standalone installation) is considerably faster than standard pnpm.

Current Behavior

Expected Behavior

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #

@meeroslav meeroslav requested a review from vsavkin as a code owner April 24, 2023 11:08
@meeroslav meeroslav self-assigned this Apr 24, 2023
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 24, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
nx-dev ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Apr 24, 2023 0:25am

@meeroslav meeroslav changed the title feat(repo): use @pnpm/exe over pnpm for nightly runs feat(repo): use @pnpm/exe over pnpm for CI runs Apr 24, 2023
@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Apr 24, 2023

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit 623c1a9. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this branch


✅ Successfully ran 1 target

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 3, 2023

This pull request has already been merged/closed. If you experience issues related to these changes, please open a new issue referencing this pull request.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 3, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants